The Caucus
The latest on President Obama, the new administration and other news from Washington and around the nation. Join the discussion.
This is a blog about the best Fan Zone in Power Soccer, the USA Fan Zone! Come and enjoy, apply for the ability to post blogs here if you wish! Talk to msl12allstar.
Copied from New York Times
The death of Edward M. Kennedy immediately raises the question of who will succeed him in the Senate — and how quickly — as Congress is embroiled in a bitter battle over plans to overhaul the nation’s health care system.
The latest on President Obama, the new administration and other news from Washington and around the nation. Join the discussion.
Share your thoughts.
One of Senator Kennedy’s last public acts before he died on Tuesday was an emotional plea to Massachusetts state lawmakers that they replace him quickly upon his death. Though he did not cite any issues specifically, his note was viewed as an acknowledgment that his absence would leave uncertain not only the identity of his replacement, but also the essence and fate of health care reform, his most cherished legislative goal.
In the letter, dated July 2, Mr. Kennedy asked lawmakers to amend the state’s rules and grant the governor the power to appoint his successor until a special election could be held.
“It is vital for this Commonwealth to have two voices speaking for the needs of its citizens and two votes in the Senate during the approximately five months between a vacancy and a special election,” he wrote.
While Massachusetts voters would probably vote in another Democratic senator, any delays caused by a special election could hinder efforts by the party to corral the 60 votes needed in the United States Senate to move health care legislation forward.
But the effort to find a quick replacement for Mr. Kennedy may prove complicated. In the week before his death, reaction in Boston to his request ranged from muted to hostile. The state’s Democrats found themselves in the awkward position of being asked to reverse their own 2004 initiative calling for special elections in such instances.
Until that year, Massachusetts law had called for the governor to appoint a temporary replacement if a Senate seat became vacant. But when Senator John Kerry, a Democrat, was running for president in 2004, the Democrat-controlled State Legislature wanted to deny the governor at the time — Mitt Romney, a Republican — the power to name a successor if Mr. Kerry won. The resulting law requires a special election within 145 to 160 days after the vacancy occurs.
“The hypocrisy is astounding,” the state House minority leader, Bradley H. Jones Jr., told The Boston Globe on Thursday. “If we had a Republican governor right now, would we be getting the same letter?”
In an interview Wednesday morning with WBZ News Radio in Boston, Gov.Deval Patrick signaled that he was in favor of granting Senator Kennedy’s request to change state law and allow Mr. Patrick to appoint a temporary successor until a special election can take place.
“I believe that the senator’s request to permit the governor to appoint someone to serve for the five months between now and that special election is eminently reasonable and, I think, especially timely when you consider the momentous proposals in front of the Congress right now around health care reform and climate change and so forth,” Mr. Patrick said. “Massachusetts needs two voices in the United States Senate.”
He added: “But having said that, now is the time for us to reflect on the senator s life and contributions and to pray for the comfort of his wife, Vicki, and their family. We’ll turn to succession in due time."
Even if Mr. Kennedy’s death prompts a change of heart, the State Legislature is not set to return until after Labor Day.
In the United States Senate, Mr. Kennedy’s absence had been felt for months before his death as he underwent treatment for a malignant brain tumor at his home in Cape Cod. As deliberations began on a major health overhaul effort — an issue Mr. Kennedy called “the cause of my life” — he had to hand off day-to-day oversight of the health committee to a close friend, Senator Christopher J. Dodd of Connecticut.
Despite his reputation as an unapologetic liberal, Mr. Kennedy was known inside the Senate as a master of negotiation, and senators were divided over whether the ultimate bill would be more — or less — bipartisan if he had been around to shepherd it through. Mr. Dodd, who moved a version out of the Health Committee, said he stayed true to Mr. Kennedy’s convictions.
Others disagree.
“It is a very one-sided, very liberal bill,” said Senator Orrin G. Hatch of Utah. “I know that Ted would not have done that had he been able to be here.”
Because of their struggles pushing the health care overhaul forward, Democrats have increasingly been considering using a process called “reconciliation” to advance the legislation with just a simple majority, rather than 60 votes. With Mr. Kennedy gone and Senator Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia also in poor health, such a maneuver seems even more likely.
Several people, inside the family and beyond, have been discussed as possible candidates to take Mr. Kennedy’s place in the Senate.
In the letter discussing his successor, Mr. Kennedy said the appointee should offer the “explicit, personal commitment” not to run for the seat in the special election. His wife, confidant and policy adviser, Vicki Kennedy, has been subject of speculation in the state as a possible successor, though she said before his death that she was not interested.
Other family members seen as possible heirs include his nephew, former RepresentativeJoseph P. Kennedy II, who has $2 million in leftover campaign funds. Mr. Kennedy has expressed reluctance to return to politics but has not closed the door on the possibility. Senator Kennedy’s sons, Edward M. Kennedy Jr. and Representative Patrick J. Kennedy of Rhode Island, have also been mentioned.
Outside the family, there is a stable of high-profile Massachusetts Democrats considered possible successors, including state Attorney General Martha Coakley and former Representative Martin Meehan, who retired to become chancellor of the University of Massachusetts-Lowell last year, but who has about $4.8 million in campaign cash left.
If you are an American soccer fan or Mexican, you will undoubtedly know about the upcoming World Cup Qualifying Match occurring on the 12th, just 3 days from now. This match is huge, if the USA wins they will have a chance to jump to the top of the qualifying bracket passing Costa Rica(if they lose their 6th match) and regaining lost pride from the humiliating loss on American soil during the Gold Cup Final. Despite both teams using their reserves in that match, it still meant a lot for Mexico who normally dominates the rivalry, with a record of 29-11-15 overall, though USA having the main say since 2000.
Mexico is currently 4th in Qualifying, with only this and another match reaming this could be live or die for them, as a win would put them in a much better position and most likely give them the momentum to finish with another win. The top 3 in the group get into the World Cup in 2010, with the 4th place team having to play the 5th place team from South America (currently Ecuador) for a trip to South Africa next summer.
So here are the stakes, USA playing to regain lost dignity and a definite place in the World Cup (If they do lose their next two games, there is a possibility, however low, that they won't make it), and Mexico playing for a better position in Qualifying, currently only one point below 3rd place Honduras. A draw would profit America the best as they would also be secure with that result, while a draw for Mexico means they are in the hands of fate.
See you at the Azteca on the 12th at 3pm ET! It will definitely be on TV.
NEW BRITAIN, Conn. -- The Harrisburg City Islanders came from behind to upset the New England Revolution 2-1 in overtime in a third-round match Tuesday night in the Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup.
Geoff Bloes scored the winning goal late in the first overtime. Mo Odur also scored for Harrisburg City, which plays defending Open Cup champion D.C. United in the quarterfinals July 7. Harrisburg City is a USL-2 team and D.C. United play in Major League Soccer, as do the Revolution.
Two years ago, New England beat Harrisburg City 2-1 in the quarterfinals and went on to win the championship. This time, New England played with mostly reserves because several starters were out with injuries
"It?s nice to get some redemption," Bloes said.
New England used mostly reserves because several starters were out with injuries. The Revolution were forced to play short-handed for the final 30 minutes of regulation and both 15-minute overtime periods after injuries to Khelli Dube in the 63rd minute and Michael Videira in the 81st minute. Revs coach Steve Nicol used all three of his substitutions at halftime, leaving his team without any reserves for the final 45 minutes.
Early in the first overtime, New England was three players down momentarily when Sainey Nyassi was shaken up.
"We had to make changes at halftime because people who were playing were already (playing hurt)," Nicol said. "There?s nothing you can do."
Harrisburg City, which was playing its third road game in five days, tied it in the 67th minute when Odur headed in a free kick from 35 yards by Jason Pelletier. The Islanders took the lead in the 105th minute when Bloes knocked in a loose ball that New England goalkeeper Brad Knighton wasn?t able to control.
Earlier, New England took a 1-0 lead on a free kick by midfielder Jeff Larentowicz in the 38th minute. He sent a low shot from 20 yards that went inside the far goalpost.
In the second half, Bloes also made a huge play on defense when he stopped a 40-foot shot by Stephane Assengue from going in.
"I think we came out of the locker room with more confidence," Harrisburg City coach Bill Becher said. "The message was, We're already down a goal, what are we going to lose?? We came out more aggressive."
-Johannesburg
In a shocking development the U.S.A. Soccer Team is stunning the world and Brazil, with a 2-0 lead at half time against the 5-time world champions. They aren't looking much like the team that beat the U.S.A. 3-0 earlier in the cup.
They are still out shooting, out possessing, and out skilling the Americans, but they are lacking where it counts, the score. Efficiency is something the U.S. is not lacking no more than 2 shots on goal and no less than 2 shots in the goal.
It started off with the U.S. scoring in the 10' with a little touch off of Spector’s fantastic cross, following their pattern of scoring first. Then, some 10 minutes later the U.S.A. looks a little like their opponents, with a fantastic counter off a Brazil corner, with Donovan and Davies with some beautiful passes finished off by great composure from Donovan to knock it in the net from the top of the 18.
Look for Tim Howard to continue to be a big presence with terrific positioning and saves, but watch out for the likes of Melo, Robinho, and last but not least Kaka. The U.S. must continue to play smart and create opportunities off counter attacks, because Dunga is not going to go easy. See you back in 45 minutes!